4 Comments

Scott, Dumas, Sienkiewicz and Tolstoy understood that history was their friend but not their absolute master. And occasionally they played for the other team in non-fiction: one of Scott's later productions was a multi-volume biography of Napoleon Bonaparte.

Expand full comment
Apr 24Liked by Felix Purat

Tangental to your main point, where I went to college, the James-Younger gang met their end (1876). They killed the college treasurer (a Union veteran) because he refused to open a bank safe. As you may know, the local farmers shot them up and the gang survivors fled. But it isn't common knowledge that they burned a dozen grain mills as they fled. Also I've heard that they picked one of the banks there to rob because a Union general was one of the owners. It seems like they were continuing the war, or maybe having revenge. Jesse and Frank James escaped but the others did not. When I was a student there, you could buy at the supermarket period photographs on postcards of their bullet-ridden corpses. Your main point is our human need for outlaws, symbols and story-carriers of resistance to the bureaucratic One State, and I agree. This can co-exist in fiction, song and myth, with a dislike of real criminals and murderers. There may be an inconsistency there but that's okay, an irritant can help the story, tell it all.

Expand full comment