Comrades,
Welcome to the desert of the real.
This year, I will endeavour to publish twice a week; Politics midweek, Culture or Bonus Obscenities on the weekend.
If you have the means, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Hakuin Ekaku, the Japanese Zen Buddhist from the early 17th century, taught his pupils to hear the sound of one hand clapping: “Two hands clap and there is a sound. What is the sound of one hand?”[i] It looks that Claudia Roth, the German Minister of Culture, has learned how to do this.
At the closing ceremony of the Berlinale, the Palestinian film-maker Basel Adra and the Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham jointly took to the stage to accept the best documentary prize for their film No Other Land, which charts the eradication of Palestinian villages in the West Bank. Adra said he struggled to celebrate his film’s success while people in Gaza were “being slaughtered and massacred”, and urged Germany to cease arms exports to Israel. Speaking immediately afterwards, Abraham decried a “situation of apartheid” that meant that his film-making partner did not enjoy the same voting rights and freedom of movement even though they lived only 30 minutes apart.
The public enthusiastically clapped the two, including Claudia Roth. Politicians were quick to condemn the event: Berlin’s conservative mayor, Kai Wegner, described the speeches at the Berlinale closing ceremony as an “intolerable relativisation,” and wrote: “The full responsibility for the deep suffering in Israel and the Gaza strip lies with Hamas.” A delegate for the Christian Democratic Union called for Roth’s resignation, while a politician for the Free Democratic Party proposed that the film festival’s state funding be withdrawn. Now comes the saddest moment: Roth issued a statement where she insisted she was only clapping the Israeli but not the Palestinian half of a film-making duo that won one of the major awards; she called the statements at the gala “shockingly one-sided and characterized by deep hatred of Israel”, saying the lack of a mention of Hamas’s terror attack was “not acceptable.” Yet another clear case of how even the German liberals who occasionally express their “concern” with Palestinian suffering move in the terrain determined by the conservative full supporters of Israel: they immediately “clarify” a gesture considered “problematic” by the conservatives.
The premise of Roth’s “clarification” is the mantra we were hearing all the time after October 7: the Hamas attack should not in any way be relativized, it was an act of unprovoked pure evil. So while we should not talk about the ruins of Gaza without mentioning October 7, the question of what situation created conditions for the October 7 attack is totally prohibited… This premise now lost the last shred of credibility: what Israel is doing now in Gaza is also a crime which cannot be justified as an act of defence. It should be judged as an act of its own, in exactly the same way that the Nazi Holocaust and the October 7 Hamas attack should be judged. And Palestinians now have the full right to fight back in exactly the same way Israel had the right to counterattack Hamas. Israel itself gave them this right with the manner of its “defence” (or, in Putin’s words, of its “special military operation” in Gaza).
But it is also important to note that No Other Land is a film about the West Bank, not Gaza – till October 7 attacks, Hamas had a very marginal influence in the West Bank. Israel now tries to prove that Hamas was also active there, and that settlers are just defending themselves – for obvious reasons: the implication is that the West Bank Palestinians should be treated in the same way as the Gaza Palestinians. Since the October 7 attack, the UN office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs has recorded 590 attacks against Palestinians in the West Bank. (The terror on Palestinians in the divided city of Hebron is a special case, widely documented by numerous video clips.) The attacked farmers tell the same story as Abu Awad who reported the incident to the police, adding: “I got official paperwork saying I’d filed a complaint but nothing happened.” The reaction of the West? “As the UK, US and France impose sanctions on ‘extremist Israeli settlers’, Palestinians face assault by gun, bulldozer and attack dog”[ii] – like an obscene bad joke.
If Israel is the only Western democracy and the reign of law in the Middle East, and the state does nothing, why not sanction the state which not only tolerates but even supports such behavior (Ben Gvir)? “You have settlers that, half a year ago, came and beat [Palestinians] up as civilians, and now they are in [military] uniform with guns, and they come to beat you up,” said Shaul, another Palestinian farmer. “And you don’t know: is this part of their military assignment? Or are they just doing it in their free time?” “Almost half of at least 186 violent settler incidents resulting in casualties or property damage have been in the presence of, or supported by, Israeli forces. Settlers have used weapons in almost a third of these incidents.” There is no other way than to posit a simple equation: “Settler violence = state violence.”[iii]
This is too much even for some Western politicians: when David Cameron recently indicated that the UK will perhaps one-sidedly (without the consent of Israel) recognize Israel, was he not (measured by the standards of the present government of Israel) acting as an anti-Semite? Ami Ayalon, a former leader of Shin Bet, said on January 14 2023: “We Israelis will have security only when they, Palestinians, will have hope. This is the equation.”[iv] Israel will not have security until Palestinians have their own state, and Israeli authorities should release Marwan Barghouti, jailed leader of the second intifada, to direct negotiations to create one: “Look into the Palestinian polls. He is the only leader who can lead Palestinians to a state alongside Israel. First of all because he believes in the concept of two states, and secondly because he won his legitimacy by sitting in our jails.” Is he not “anti-Semitic” here by the German standards? Does he not “relativize”/contextualize the Hamas attack?
How does the German full support of Israel affect the key event going on in Israel itself? Yuval Harari believes the biggest threat to his country comes not from Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran, but from the battle between Israelis for the "soul of the nation": "Personally, I fear most for really the soul of my country, of my nation in Israel at the moment. There is really a battle for the soul of the Israeli nation between patriotism on the one side and ideals of Jewish supremacy on the other side."[v] This brings us to the saddest fact: the German full support of Israel is not neutral in the ongoing struggle for the soul of Israeli Jews. Whatever the German intentions, it puts Germany firmly on the side of Jewish supremacy which has an extremely ominous past and present - here is what some Rabbis teaching at the (state-financed) Eli Academy, an elite school where many army officers are educated, are saying:
“The Holocaust was not about killing the Jews. Nonsense. And that it was systematic and ideological makes it more moral than random murder. Humanism, secular culture – that is the Holocaust. The real Holocaust is pluralism. To believe in man - that is the holocaust. /…/ The Nazi logic was internally consistent. Hitler said that a certain group in society is the cause of all the evil in the world and therefore it must be exterminated. /…/ For years, God has been screaming that the Diaspora is over but Jews aren’t obeying. That is their disease that the Holocaust must cure. /…/ Hitler was the most righteous, Of course he was right in every word he said. His ideology was correct. /…/ Their (Nazi’s) only error was who was on which side.”(Israel Channel 13 News, 19 April 2019[vi])
The continuity with Nazism is here directly asserted: Hitler practiced a correct stance, his only error was that he chose Jews (instead of Arabs) as the principal enemy to be annihilated. But even the annihilation of European Jews played a positive role: it was part of God’s plan to bring Jews back from Diaspora to their land. The conclusion is terrifying: Zionist who founded Israel are the corrected Nazis, they continue the Nazi politics with the only change that they apply it to a correct enemy… Although such an extreme stance is, of course, explicitly advocated only by a minority (but Smotrich spoke there and Netanyahu himself visited the Eli Academy, as can be seen on the video report!), it brings out the underlying premises that sustain what the State of Israel is now doing on the West Bank. Seyla Benhabib pointed out that the members of the present government of Israel are
“the legatees of a long line of Judeo-fascism, which none other than Albert Einstein, joined by Hannah Arendt and Sidney Hook, denounced in their Open Letter to the NY Times on December 2, 1948, titled “New Palestine Party: Menachem Begin and Aims of Political Movement Discussed.” They write: Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine…. Today the legatees of this party and movement — Likud was established by Menachem Begin — are in power in Israel and they have brought upon Israel the worst disaster since the Holocaust.”[vii]
The conclusion that imposes itself from all this is what Harari calls the other, dark side of Israeli’s “soul,” the belief in Jewish supremacy, is in direct continuity with Nazism – and, to go to the end in this direction, THIS is the true deeper reason why Germany unconditionally supports Israel. So what are we to do? Owen Jones made a proper suggestion: countries should begin to boycott not Israel (which effectively is in a difficult situation) but Germany which is now continuing an inverted Nazi politics. “It’s increasingly clear that writers, artists and performers should boycott German events. As well as an orgy of state sanctioned anti-Palestinian racism, it’s estimated nearly a third of those targeted by Germany for ‘antisemitism’ are Jews.”[viii] We witness here a well-known scene again: Germans shouting at and oppressing Jews, deciding who is a bad and who a good Jew… So Germany got everything: full support of the darkest side of the Israeli soul with historical links to Nazism, and, as a surplus-enjoyment, a chance to humiliate and punish selected Jews again.
[ii] ‘They took our home, our land, everything’: Palestinians displaced by illegal settlers tell their stories | Palestinian territories | The Guardian.
[iii] Settler Violence = State Violence | B'Tselem (btselem.org).
[iv] Ex-ShinBet head says Israel should negotiate with jailed intifada leader | Israel | The Guardian.
[v] Yuval Noah Harari: 'There is a battle for the soul of the Israeli nation' (youtube.com).
[vi] The Miseducation of Israel - YouTube. See also a report in Embracing racism, rabbis at pre-army yeshiva laud Hitler, urge enslaving Arabs | The Times of Israel. As expected, the defense of the Rabbis was that their statements were taken out of context: they wanted precisely to show how to help Arabs…
[vii] An Open Letter To My Friends Who Signed “Philosophy for Palestine” | by The Hannah Arendt Center | Amor Mundi | Nov, 2023 | Medium.